The Historian's Perspective
"The pirates' ruse luring a merchantman in the
olden days," print c. 1896 (Courtesy of the Library of Congress)
Avast! How the US built a Navy, Sent in the Marines,
and Faced Down the Barbary Pirates
by Christopher L. Miller
In October, 1784, an American merchant vessel, the
Betsey, was
on a trade run from her home port of Boston to Tenerife in the Canary
Islands when she was approached by an un-flagged vessel. Suddenly, “sabers
grasped between their teeth and their loaded pistols in their belts,”
pirates swarmed onto the unarmed merchantman and demanded that the crew
surrender immediately. Pirates they were, but not colorful rogues in the
Jack Sparrow mold, nor were they the precursors of privateers currently
preying on ships off the coast of Somalia. And while they styled themselves
Mujahedeen, they were also not Islamic terrorists or freedom
fighters. These were, instead, official agents of the four Berber states
in North Africa—Algiers, Tunis, Morocco, and Tripoli—practicing
a long-accepted form of commerce and diplomacy. These were the Barbary
Pirates, against whom the United States fought its first declared war
after gaining independence.
Crew members were stripped of their clothing and valuables and locked
in the hold while the now hostage
Betsey was sailed through the
Straits of Gibraltar and on to Morocco, where the ship and crew would
serve as leverage in Morocco’s venture to open diplomatic relations
with the United States on the Moroccan emperor’s terms. Very shortly
thereafter, Algiers followed suit, seizing the
Dauphin and the
Maria along with their crews. In England, the anti-American Lord
Sheffield gloated, “It will not be an easy matter to bring the American
States to act as a nation. America cannot retaliate.”
Indeed, any sort of action on the part of the “American States”
would have been difficult. There was no provision in the Articles of Confederation
to address an issue like this. Not to mention the fact that the country
was broke, in debt to its own citizens as well as to foreign lenders and
lacking any economic infrastructure to turn the situation around. Americans
could produce food for themselves, but that was just about all; the nation’s
economy had always been driven by trade and now, thanks to the Barbary
Pirates, trade was clearly in peril. For the moment, the American consul
in Algiers, Richard O’Brien, suggested that we follow a diplomatic
course, writing “It is bad policy to use any threats or make any
parade with cruisers if we intend suing for a peace.” As a major
first step, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams met in
London with representatives from Morocco to resolve the
Betsey
situation. Offering a “gift” of $20,000 to the emperor, the
Americans hashed out a “Treaty of Peace and Friendship” dated
June 23, 1786 (and “The Ramadan Year of the Hejira 1200”).
Pacifying the Algerians, however, would not prove so easy. Following O’Brien’s
advice, Congress authorized a payment of $200 per captive to redeem the
crews of the
Dauphin and
Maria but when he learned that
the US was willing to pay, the ruling Dey of Algiers demanded $1,200 a
head. Still seeking a peaceful course, Congress complied. The Dey then
increased the ransom to $3,000 per person.
The inconclusive dickering set off a great debate in the United States
about what course to follow. Thomas Jefferson advocated using force. Working
through his friend the Marquis de Lafayette, Jefferson tried to stitch
together a sort of coalition of the willing composed of small trading
states like Naples, Rome, and Venice who could take turns with the United
States in patrolling the North African coast, bottling the pirates up
in their ports. But this would require the United States to construct
a navy, which John Adams argued was financially irresponsible when ransom
would be cheaper. Moreover, he noted, “We ought not to fight them
unless we determine to fight them forever.” This debate came to
naught, however, when French Foreign Minister, Vergennes, ordered Lafayette
to stay out of the pirate business because, Vergennes told him, the English
and French governments profited from it. As Franklin once observed, “If
there were no Algiers, it would be worth England’s while to build
one.” Meanwhile, the Americans remained hostages.
It would be an overstatement to say that the pirate crisis forced the
overturning of the Articles of Confederation and the adoption of the Constitution,
but it was certainly a contributing factor. Unable to effectively pursue
either a bellicose or a diplomatic course that might bring a permanent
solution to the Barbary situation, it was referenced many times in the
debates over changing the frame of government. But even after the Constitution
was ratified and a more robust system put in place, solutions remained
elusive. Now secretary of state, Jefferson advocated to Congress that
it adopt a policy of force, and finally in January 1791 the Senate issued
a resolution “That the trade of the United States to the Mediterranean
cannot be protected but by a naval force, and that it will be proper to
resort to the same as soon as the state of the public finances will admit.”
But public finances were not going to permit anything immediately and,
frustrated by the Americans’ lack of cooperation and emboldened
by a treaty with Portugal, Algeria went on a rampage in 1793, seizing
eleven US vessels within a matter of weeks. Finally, in the following
January, Congress acted upon a direct request from George Washington to
build “a naval force, adequate to the protection of the commerce
of the United States against the Algerine corsairs.” But by then,
the French Revolution and conflict between France and England threatened
the US even more ominously than did the pirates. To put off additional
problems in the Mediterranean, Congress authorized a ransom to Algiers
of $642,500 and promised annual payments in the form of war materials,
including a thirty-six-gun frigate.
Jefferson was unhappy. In a 1786 letter to Adams he had made his case
favoring war over diplomacy:
1. Justice is in favor of this opinion. 2. Honor favors it. 3. It will
procure us respect in Europe, and respect is a safe-guard to interest.
4. It will arm the federal head with the safest of all the instruments
of coercion over their delinquent members and prevent them from using
what would be less safe. … 5. I think it least expensive. 6. Equally
effectual.
But only after Jefferson became president in 1801 would his case be pursued,
setting a dangerous precedent in the process.
By the time Jefferson entered the White House, Congress was shelling out
nearly one-fifth of the national budget to buy off the Barbary Pirates
and they were still clamoring for more. During 1800, Tripoli had taken
two US ships, the
Catherine and the
Franklin, and was
demanding $100,000 in ransom. Tunis, too, was pressuring the US for forty
cannons and a stand of 10,000 muskets as well as an American-built frigate
of their own. Jefferson wanted war, but was convinced that Congress would
not support it. He therefore asserted an executive privilege: by executive
order he sent a small fleet of American warships to the Mediterranean
with instructions to protect US commerce, enforce existing agreements
with the nations in the region, and to “chastise” pirates
when caught in the act. But as this “police action” was unfolding,
Yusuf Qaramanli, the Pasha of Tripoli, warned the American consul that
“A delay [in payments] on your part cannot but be prejudicial to
your interests.” With no payment forthcoming, on May 14, 1801, Qaramanli
ordered the flagpole outside the American consulate cut down: a colorful
and effective declaration of war.
Although Jefferson had already dispatched a fleet to the Mediterranean,
he was certain that it would not be adequate to deal with a formally declared
war with Tripoli and concerned that the other Barbary states might weigh
in at any time. He therefore made it known to Congress that more formal
action was called for. They finally obliged by passing the “Act
for Protection of Commerce and Seamen of the United States against the
Tripolitan Corsairs” on February 6, 1802. This authorized an expanded
force of five frigates and a contingent of Marines to “subdue, seize
and make prize of all vessels, goods and effects, belonging to the Bey
of Tripoli, or to his subjects.” Command of the expanded force was
given to Edward Preble, a veteran of the Revolutionary Navy and an experienced
captain. Taking the formidable USS
Constitution as his flagship,
he led a force of fairly young and inexperienced sailors into the nation’s
first formal war.
The US Mediterranean Fleet enjoyed some immediate victories against isolated
pirate targets, but success was not to last. At the end of October, the
American frigate
Philadelphia ran aground while chasing a shallow-drafted
Algerian polacca. Despite frantic efforts to free the ship, hostile vessels
soon had it surrounded and Captain William Bainbridge and his crew of
more than 300 men were forced to surrender. Adding insult to injury, the
pirates were able to dislodge the
Philadelphia and haul it into
port along with the prisoners. Pasha Qaramanli immediately renamed the
frigate The
Gift of Allah and prepared to put it into combat
against the Americans. Disturbed at the prospect of facing one of his
own ships in open combat, Preble consulted with his junior officers and
came up with a daring plan. Rigging a captured ketch to look like a pirate
ship, young naval lieutenant Stephan Decatur and a small volunteer crew
sailed into the harbor with the mission of either recapturing the lost
frigate or destroying it. They had to settle for the latter, burning the
Philadelphia to the waterline. British naval legend Horatio Lord
Nelson proclaimed Decatur’s action to be “the most bold and
daring act of the age,” and despite the fact that it was an act
of sheer desperation at a moment of defeat, Americans celebrated it as
well.
But the disturbing fact remained that Pasha Qaramanli now had over 300
additional hostages and the Americans had one less ship of the line. At
this juncture, the American consul in Tunis, William Eaton, proposed an
odd plan. Yusuf Qaramanli had become Pasha by deposing his brother, Hamid.
Eaton requested funding, troops, and naval support to topple Yusuf and
replace him with Hamid, promising that the latter would be a reliable
ally to the United States and would release all of the hostages with no
further fuss. While no one in authority was enthusiastic about the idea,
the new commodore in the Mediterranean, Samuel Barron, agreed to give
Eaton a force of eight Marines and the use of three ships to ferry provisions.
Eaton immediately repaired to Egypt, where Hamid was living in exile,
rounded up the deposed Pasha and a ragtag army of mostly mercenaries and
set off across the desert to storm the port city of Derna. Once there,
Eaton’s force would be joined by a naval squadron that would assist
in assaulting Tripoli itself, instituting regime change and ending the
war.
Despite incredible odds and hardships, Eaton’s force actually succeeded
in crossing the desert, arriving outside the walls of Derna and capturing
the city on April 27, 1805. However Pasha Qaramanli was not about to tolerate
any continuation of Eaton’s efforts. He sent a force of three thousand
men to retake the city, but Eaton successfully defended Derna and then
began making plans for the next stage in his campaign. At that point,
however, events elsewhere intervened. Nervous about Eaton’s likelihood
for success, Secretary of State James Madison had sent a new ambassador,
Tobias Lear, to Tripoli to try to negotiate a solution. Realizing that
he was in a precarious position, Yusuf agreed to receive Lear, who concluded
a treaty with the Pasha on June 4. Through the treaty, the US returned
one hundred Tripolitan prisoners of war in exchange for the
Philadelphia
captives and granted the Pasha $60,000 in exchange for the promise not
only to stop raiding American shipping, but to defend the Americans against
predations by his neighbors. Needless to say, Eaton was terribly disappointed
when he learned that both the crisis and his dreams of military glory
were now over. As for Hamid, he was so impressed by the US Marines in
Eaton’s little army that he gave his sword to their commander, Lieutenant
Presley O'Bannon, initiating the tradition of Marines carrying “Mameluke”
swords.
Back in the United States, the sense of relief was palpable, but not everyone
was convinced that the problem with the Barbary Pirates was permanently
solved. Early on in the crisis, Jefferson had commented: “There
is no end to the demand of these powers. Nor any security in their promises.”
Even so, things remained peaceful along the Barbary Coast until opportunity
once again opened the door for pirate raids when war broke out between
the United States and Great Britain in 1812. Almost immediately American
shipping in the Mediterranean was interrupted: in September the American
brig
Edwin was seized by Algiers, followed by similar actions
on the part of Tunis and Tripoli. In the midst of a war against the seemingly
all-powerful British Empire, Americans could do little to prevent such
incursions on the nation’s sovereignty beyond advising merchants
to avoid the region.
When the war with Britain ended, however, an American public flushed with
nationalistic pride in having “won” such a lopsided conflict,
pushed to flex its muscles again by exacting vengeance on the Barbary
Pirates. Now president, Madison was as reticent about a war in North Africa
as he had been in 1805. Nonetheless, political pressure on the mild-mannered
president was heavy, forcing him in March 1815 to ask Congress for a formal
declaration of war against Algiers. Congress enthusiastically granted
his request and a force of ten warships under the command of William Bainbridge
and Stephan Decatur was dispatched to the Mediterranean to end piracy
once and for all. Now hardened veterans after the many naval encounters
with Britain during the War of 1812, the American Navy was nothing like
it had been during its first encounters with the Barbary Pirates. Decatur
and Bainbridge devastated every enemy vessel they encountered, taking
in all twenty-nine enemy flags (which they stitched together as a gift
for First Lady Dolly Madison). And on the morning of June 28 the flotilla
sailed boldly into the harbor at Algiers, trained its guns on the city
and palace, and demanded immediate surrender. Decatur instructed the Dey
that “If you insist in receiving powder as tribute, you must expect
to receive balls with it.” The Algerian ruler immediately agreed
to Decatur’s terms: releasing all Americans in his custody and,
in a notable turn of the tables, the Dey was to pay the United States
$10,000 in indemnities. Having settled matters with Algiers, Decatur’s
force then went on to Tunis and Tripoli where they concluded similar agreements.
For his part, Decatur released all but a handful of his pirate prisoners
of war, though he brought seven back with him to the United States where
they were put on display in several New York theaters.
Thus ended the thirty years of recurring war between the United States
and the Barbary Pirates that had begun with the seizure of the
Betsey
in 1784. But this still was not the end of the story. At the Congress
of Vienna, the peace conference that ended the Napoleonic Wars, the great
powers of Europe concluded that piracy in the Mediterranean was no longer
in their economic or diplomatic best interest and resolved to use all
force at their disposal to end it permanently. Thus a year after Decatur’s
successful venture in the region, a joint Anglo-Dutch force attacked the
Barbary Coast, making it clear to the pirate powers that they needed to
seek alternative sources of income. Never again would Barbary Pirates
haunt the sea lanes in the Straits of Gibraltar; the Golden Age of piracy
was over.
Christopher L. Miller is an associate professor of
history at the University of Texas-Pan American. He is the author of Prophetic
Worlds: Indians and Whites on the Columbia Plateau.
HOME