Conflict and Commerce: The Rise and Fall of New Netherland
by Simon Middleton
Lecturer in History, University of Sheffield
In September 1609, when Henry Hudson guided his ship, De Halve Maen,
through the narrows dividing present day Staten and Long Islands, he was
not the first European navigator to sail into what we know today as New York
Bay. The Italian explorer Giovanni da Verrazzano came in 1524; the Frenchmen,
Jean Alfonse de Saintonge and Jean Cossin, made separate voyages over the next
half century. But it was Hudson’s arrival that established a Dutch claim to
the region and changed its history for all time.
Hudson, an English mariner in Dutch employ, had left
Amsterdam in April intending to explore the Arctic seas
north of Norway for a possible eastern route to the
rich trade of the Indies. When ice floes barred the
way, his eighty-five-foot vessel and its crew of sixteen
mariners turned to the west and journeyed five thousand
miles to North America. For weeks they navigated southwards
within sight of the shore, looking for an estuary or
bay that might indicate the beginnings of a western
route to Asia. By August they had reached Long Island
and, after a few days exploring the coast around Sandy
Hook, Hudson set off up the broad, deep, and promising
river that now bears his name. Although the intrepid
captain failed to locate a route to Asia—his navigation
of the Hudson ended at the site of modern day Albany—he
had discovered a territory rich in timber and furs that
would please his Dutch financiers back in Amsterdam.
Hudson’s voyage took place at a critical moment in Atlantic
history, and, in particular, for the challenge of northern
European states to the power of Spain. Weakened by the
loss of the Armada to England in 1588 and by relentless
attacks on its New World gold fleets, Spain was plagued
by financial crises that pushed it to the edge of collapse.
The Spanish had also been unable to put down a revolt
by its northern Dutch provinces, eight of which had
declared their independence and established a new Dutch
Republic. In April 1609, after decades of intermittent
and inconclusive hostilities, the two sides agreed to
a truce, allowing Dutch merchants to back voyages such
as Hudson’s without fear of Spanish attack and financial
ruin.
Once news of Hudson’s discovery reached Holland, new
expeditions arrived to trade beads, knives, and hatchets
for furs with the Munsee and Lenape Indians. These private
traders established a fortified trading post, Fort Nassau,
at the site of present day Albany and charted the coastline
and river inlets between Cape Cod and the Delaware Bay.
In 1614, one of them, Adrian Block, produced the first
map of the territory which he named New Netherland.
The following year, Block and others formed the New
Netherland Company and secured a three-year monopoly
of the region’s trade from the States General, the governing
body of the Dutch Republic.
New Netherland, like other early American colonies,
was a state-sponsored venture, the aim of which was
to realize a profit and serve the emerging Dutch state
by eliminating competition from other trading ports
and capturing more of the Indies from Portugal and Spain.
In 1621, the States General drew up a charter for a
new West India Company, granting it a monopoly of all
the Dutch Atlantic trade with West Africa, Brazil, the
Caribbean and North America. The Company was a joint-stock
venture, financed by government investment and private
capital to the tune of more than seven million guilders.
Like its East Indian counterpart, it was managed by
the shareholders who met in five regional chambers.
The company enjoyed some success in its early years,
establishing trading posts on both sides of the Atlantic,
dealing in slaves on the coast of Africa, as well as
gold, ivory, and sugar in the Caribbean, Suriname, and
the northeast coast of Brazil. New Netherland was only
part of the Company’s concern, and a relatively minor
one at that. In the summer of 1624, the Company established
a small settlement under the command of Cornelis Jacobsz
May, the first provincial director, transporting some
thirty families to what is now Governor’s Island. More
colonists arrived the following year, and the settlement
was relocated a short distance across the bay to the
equally secure and more commodious lower tip of Manhattan,
establishing New Amsterdam, later New York City. To
secure the settlement, Peter Minuit, then the provincial
director, offered sixty guilders worth of blankets,
kettles, and knives to neighboring Indians, who accepted
the trade goods as gifts, sealing a defensive alliance
with the newcomers and not, as was once supposed, as
payment for the island of Manhattan. Fifteen years after
Hudson’s arrival, New Netherland, the newest commercial
outpost of the Dutch empire, consisted of a small group
of traders living in at the edge of a vast and rich
wilderness.
The settlers' peace with the numerous local Native American
tribes was tenuous at best. The large linguistic and
cultural native groupings of Algonquian and Iroquoian
Indians who inhabited the region were subdivided into
smaller communities that were frequently at war
or in some form of alliance with each other. The arrival
of the Dutch had piqued the interest of local Indians,
who regarded the newcomers as potential allies and sources of
new and interesting gifts that could in turn be traded
with other tribes.
Thus, the Dutch found themselves drawn into a web of
Indian diplomacy which they only partially understood.
As early as 1626, the settlers at Fort Orange (formerly
Fort Nassau) suffered a bloody defeat at the hands of
Mohawks, the enemies of the Mahicans, the tribe with
which the Dutch had been trading. Beginning in 1629, European-Amerindian commercial and
diplomatic relations became even more complicated following
the migration of thousands of English Puritans from
New England, the territory north of New Netherland.
These New Englanders provided Native Americans with yet another source of
gifts and friendship, and their rapidly growing and
spreading settlement soon threatened to overwhelm the
thinly-populated New Netherland. The arrival of the
English prompted a reassessment of the colony’s future.
In June 1629, in an attempt to bolster New Netherland’s
population, the Company announced its intention to offer
large tracts of land to patroons (a Dutch word for landowners,
from the Spanish “patrón”) who agreed to “buy” the land
from the Indians, settle fifty families within four
years, and thereafter administer their settlements’
civil and criminal courts. Unfortunately, the relatively
prosperous conditions prevailing in the United Provinces
and the limited benefits for settlers – who were expected
to endure a dangerous sea voyage to live in the North
American wilderness – hardly recommended the patroonships
as desirable destinations. All the prospective communities
except for Rensselaerswijck, established by Kiliaen
van Rensselaer on both banks of the Hudson River near
Fort Orange, failed to attract large numbers of investors
and settlers. Those who did make the trans-Atlantic
journey often deserted their designated employment,
hoping to get rich quickly by defying the Company’s regulations
and joining the lucrative fur trade. Meanwhile, English
colonists continued to settle in the Dutch territory.
The failure of the patroonship scheme established important
precedents for the future. The easing of the patroon
policy in 1640, along with the arrival of independent
fur traders signalled the beginning of the end for the
Company’s trading monopoly and also drew its shareholders
and officers into civil rather than commercial
administration. By the mid-seventeenth century, New
Netherland’s future as a colony of traders and farmers
was increasingly apparent; land, not furs, would
prove to be its greatest resource.
In the second half of the 1630s, groups of Puritans
spread southwards into the Connecticut River Valley – territory previously claimed by the West India Company.
The shareholders took steps to secure their territorial
position, purchasing from the Canarsee Indians all land west of Oyster Bay on
Long Island and offering revised
terms and conditions in an attempt to attract new settlers.
Under the new “Freedoms and Exemptions” policy, adopted
in 1640, the Company gave up its trading monopoly and
offered two hundred acres of land to Dutch or English
immigrants who undertook to settle five colonists. The
change of policy succeeded in bringing new settlers to the colony.
Individual traders travelled independently to the colony
to trade for furs, and some remained on a semi-permanent
basis to represent the interests of major trading houses
in Amsterdam. Men and women were drawn across
the Atlantic by networks of family and friends. However,
the policy also encouraged the Puritans to spill across
Long Island Sound, where they established the towns
of Gravesend, Hempstead, Flushing, and Middleburgh (later
Newtown) on Long Island – a sign of the English settlers’
ever encroaching presence in the region.
By 1645, when the French Jesuit priest, Father Isaac
Jogues, visited lower Manhattan, the island was populated
by some four or five hundred men of different sects
and nationalities speaking eighteen different languages. The
population of the entire province remained no more than
a couple of thousand, but as the number of free traders
increased, so did the competition for Indian furs, prompting
subtle changes in European-Amerindian relations. As
the caution of early years diminished,
familiarity bred exploitation, and,
in time, mutual contempt.
In 1639 the provincial director,
Willem Kieft, made the fateful decision to try and exact
a tribute from the neighbouring Raritan Indians. In
Kieft’s view, since the Indians, as defensive allies,
benefited from the presence of the Company and the colonists,
it was only reasonable that they bear some of its costs.
The Indians, for their part, could see little benefit
in having allies who stuck to the coast and concentrated
on trade, and they rejected Kieft’s authority
to levy a tribute. The two sides clashed inconclusively
until 1643, when the slaughter of some eighty Wecquaesgeek
Indians across the river from New Amsterdam at Pavonia
(Jersey City) succeeded in uniting almost
the entire Indian population of the Lower Hudson Valley
against New Netherland.
When Keift's War ended two years
later, dozens of colonists and some 1600 Indians had
been killed, and New Netherland was almost wiped out.
Appealing for intervention to the States General in
Holland, the settlers declared that “almost every place
is abandoned…we, wretched people, must skulk, with wives
and little ones that still survive in poverty together…
whilst the Indians daily threaten to overwhelm us.”1
In 1647 the Company shareholders dispatched Peter Stuyvesant
to restore the colony. A stern and sober man, Stuyvesant
was also a fiercely loyal employee who had lost a leg
in the Company’s service while fighting the Portuguese
on the Caribbean island of Saint Martin. No sooner had
he arrived than Stuyvesant and his hand-picked council
issued a flurry of orders on matters ranging from compulsory
church attendance to fire prevention and the keeping
of hogs and goats. This set the tone for his seventeen-year
administration, during which time he negotiated boundary
agreements with the English to the north, led a force
of seven hundred men to expel the Swedes from the Delaware
River to the south, and, through a combination of diplomacy
and armed force, managed to rebuild Dutch influence
and strength in the region. Stuyvesant managed to navigate
a middle course between the competing demands of settler
lobbies seeking greater autonomy and distant Company shareholders trying to preserve their authority
and chartered prerogatives. Although he acquired a reputation
as a domineering and autocratic administrator, most
historians agree that under Stuyvesant’s care, New Netherland’s
population of independent traders and farmers collaborated, establishing orderly villages and
small towns.
New Amsterdam quickly became
known as the major port and capital of this increasingly
prosperous provincial society. The origins of the city’s
government can be traced to a campaign for municipal
reform begun by local merchants in the 1640s and culminating
with the first meeting of the municipal government on
February 2, 1653. The city’s first burgomasters and
schepens (roughly equivalent to the English mayors and
aldermen) were given charge of the school,
the docks, and a newly-established public weigh-house.
But they added to their administrative powers in subsequent
years. In the course of the decade, the
lives of ordinary settlers in New Amsterdam came to
resemble those of the urban Dutch brede middenstand,
roughly equivalent to the English middling sort, who
balanced their private pursuits with public obligations
and adherence to a regulatory order, and served as a
powerful integrating force upon an otherwise diverse
settler group.
During this period of growth, neither the burgomasters
nor the ordinary colonists realized that their success
was about to become the source of their undoing. In
the late 1650s the colony's new-found prosperity attracted
the attention of powerful English interests who were
jealous of the Dutch imperial success. Within months
of Charles II’s restoration in 1660, Parliament adopted
another Navigation Act, designed to drive the Dutch
from the English-controlled American trade. The keenest
advocates of England's commercial empire gathered around
the king's younger brother, James, Duke of York. By
March 1664 James and his counsellors had succeeded in
persuading the King to grant his brother part of present-day
Maine and a handful of islands near its shores. In an
act of superlative aggrandizement, the most substantial
part of James's grant awarded him control of all the
territory lying between the Delaware and Connecticut
rivers – the territory comprising New Netherland.
In May of 1664 James, Duke of York, dispatched Colonel
Richard Nicolls with four ships and three hundred soldiers
to secure the “entyre submission and obedience” of England's
newest colonial American subjects. In mid-August the
invaders disembarked from vessels anchored off Long
Island in Gravesend Bay and moved west to Brooklyn.
Nicolls enlisted residential militias from the English
towns on Long Island and distributed handbills ahead
of the advancing troops offering fair treatment for
those who surrendered.
The English commander repeated his terms in a letter
written to Stuyvesant, promising that in return for
capitulation the settlers would “peaceably enjoy whatsoever
God's blessing and their own honest industry have furnished
them with and all other privileges with his majesty's
English subjects.” Stuyvesant wanted to make a fight
of it. But when he tried to convince New Amsterdam’s
leaders to keep news of the lenient surrender terms
– and reports of the fort’s limited supply of good gun
powder – from the inhabitants, the burgomasters left
the meeting “greatly disgusted and dissatisfied.” Furious
at their defiance, Stuyvesant tore up Nicolls's letter
offering terms. Within hours work on the city's fortifications
ceased, and a delegation of the “inhabitants of the
place assisted by their wives and children crying and
praying” confronted the director and demanded that he
re-assemble the letter and negotiate surrender. The
following day ninety-three prominent burghers – including
Stuyvesant’s own seventeen-year-old son – presented
a remonstrance denouncing resistance as a folly that
would not save “the smallest portion of our entire city,
our property and (what is dearer to us), our wives and
children, from total ruin.” Stuyvesant relented, and
merchant leaders met with Nicolls and his officers to
draft the Articles of Capitulation under which New Netherland
and New Amsterdam became New York, New York.
The conquest of New Netherland expelled the Dutch from
the continent and consolidated the English colonization
of North America. Thereafter the English turned their
attention to the French as their major European competitor
in the North Atlantic, culminating with the French and
Indian War (1756-63), which ushered in the era of the
American Revolution. But Dutch New York lived on in
the marriage choices, inheritance practices, and naming
patterns of a population which, in New York City, remained "Dutch" until at least the end of the seventeenth
century and up the Hudson River Valley for a decade
or more into the eighteenth. For those who care to look,
Dutch New York lives on still in the names of streets
and noteworthy families, and in the "cookies"
and "coleslaw" which the rest of the world
has come to consider so quintessentially American.
1 O’Callaghan, E.B. and Fernow, Berthold,
eds. Documents Relative to the Colonial History
of New York. 15 vols. Albany: 1856-87, 1: 139.
|