In This Issue
The Historians Perspective
From the Teachers Desk
The Digital Drop Box
Interactive History
Ask the Archivist
Past Issues
E-mail This Page

Loving v. Virginia (1967)



The Supreme Court ultimately reversed the Lovings' conviction, holding that statutes outlawing interracial marriage violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In reaching this conclusion, the Court explained that statutes containing racial classifications are subject to the strict scrutiny of the courts; states bear a heavy burden of proof that such statutes serve a strong state interest. Here the Court found no such interest, and concluded that "restricting the freedom to marry solely because of racial classifications violates the central meaning of [equal protection]."

Many people felt that such a ruling had been a long time coming. Despite the landmark 1952 case, Brown v. Board of Education, in which the Court ruled that segregation within the public school system violated the equal protection clause, the Court seemed consistently reluctant to use its power to interpret laws concerning personal and private matters such as marriage. In fact, the Court had declined to rule on a case similar to the Lovings' in 1955. When the Loving decision was handed down twelve years later, sixteen states had laws akin to Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute, and the consequences of this ruling were both sweeping and immediate. Over thirty years later, some are wondering how this decision might affect the issue of gay marriage and whether the Court could find a similar violation of the equal protection clause as applied to homosexuals' right to marry.

For a full summary of this case, go to:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl? court=US&vol=388&invol=1


Back to the cases
History Now -- American History Online